Talk:Arsenical bronze

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arsenical bronze article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Essay

This independent essay needs to be brought into Wikipedia, partly through links.--Wetman 07:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

What? Globbet (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the previous revision of the page. Unfortunately I don't believe that the contents were salvageable, and the style was so different from Wikipedia's norms that I couldn't be sure that it hadn't been copied here from elsewhere. For this reason I reverted to the previous stub version. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean ?

"There are no real advantages metallurgically for the superiority of tin bronze."

And this: "arsenical copper, being defined as copper with under 0.5 wt% As, below the accepted percentage in archaeological artefacts."

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arsenical bronze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100407150412/http://www.sican.org/results.html to http://www.sican.org/results.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ENGVAR

The tag here says the article is written in US English. There was a mixture so I standardised it on US English. It doesn't really matter, but it should be consistent within the article, and over time, unless there's a reason to change it. John (talk) 22:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]