Talk:Arthur Keith

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled

Fake quote

"Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation which is unthinkable."

This quote was allegedly taken from the foreward Keith wrote in the 100th anniversary edition of Darwin's Origin of Speciesin 1959. This is false. He wrote an introduction to an edition of this book, but that was nearly 30 years before. Keith died in 1955. This quote is nothing more than a fabrication by creationists.

For more info: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/part1-4.html#quote81

removed quote

Since the quote does appear to be fake, and since no one's been able to come up with any citation for it since April, I've removed it.

This quote has been put back into the article. The source listed is http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/238, which does not directly cite the quote but only cites another work (by W.A. Criswell, a former president of the Southern Baptist Convention and believer in Biblical inerrancy) that referenced this quote--that is to say, there is no direct citation of the quote itself. Given the agendas of apologeticspress and Criswell, given the apparent debunking of the quote in the talkorigins page listed above, and given the plain fact that the citation for the quote in this article is in no way a direct citation of the quote itself, it appears that this needs to be removed again, which I will now do. It would seem advisable to keep an eye out for it returning to this article in the future, as it appears to be an oft-cited quote by those whose agenda it supports. G-my 00:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References!!!!

All the quotes must have appropriate references!!!! Ljohank 21:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They should also list the page number(s) on which the quote appears.--Digthepast (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of quotes section

I deleted the quotes section. None of them are referenced, no other biographies of prominent scientists seem to have them and Wikiquote would seem to be the approriate place for them. I'm also concerned about the references for this article as both of them link to Creationist or IDist websites. A little balance would be good, as would reliable sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.168.241.1 (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Shakespeare reference

The reference to Shakespeare seems a little out of place. I don't know Merchant of Venice well enough to know if it an accurate cross-reference. Also, the wording seems to be POV (he is only saying...).

Out-of-date info and link

The text states that full-text editions of several of Keith's works are available online. This is apparently no longer the case. the linked page does not appear to contain links pointing to those works. it appears that the linked page was recently modified.--Digthepast (talk) 15:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the two reactorcore.org links; they led to "this page has been removed" pages. I cannot get the designeduniverse.org link to come up, but I'm not sure it's dead. Tumblecat (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arthur Keith.gif Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Arthur Keith.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 11 October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arthur Keith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]