Talk:Arthur Lydiard

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WOW!

This is probably the worst article I ever read on wikipedia in terms of neutrality. This could be a text from lydiardfanboys.com Just a very few examples:

"Lydiard's ground-breaking impact on distance running"
"despite his unmatched achievements"
"apart from his tremendous charisma and extraordinary ability to inspire and motivate athletes"
"Nearly every successful athletics coach or athlete active in the world today consciously or unconsciously emulates Lydiard's training system"
"These post-Lydiard training systems are unavoidably indebted to Lydiard's coaching philosophy as much as they may attempt to distance themselves from Lydiard's powerful and pervasive influence on the training of distance athletes"

This article really needs to tone down the fanboy talk and get more neutral and especially more fact based. There is only 1 reference for the whole article. The whole comparison with Horwill and Daniels, while very interesting in itself, is destroyed by the fanboy talk (secretly both seem to teach the great great perfect Lydiard system) and start backing up all the claims with references. Besides that: the comparising with other coaches and their differences in training philosophies should get their own section, in my opinion. Maybe there is something objective enough who has the necessary knowledge to improve this article --78.54.18.153 (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still excoriatingly awful

This article is still embarrassingly hideously bad. As mentioned above nearly a year ago, it is a joke, and terribly unworthy of inclusion. It would be better to delete it than leaving just an abomination out there. Really, it is so bad, it would be better to start over. Hooverdan (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing the article history, it is essentially stagnant. As it appears to have stabilized in such an embarrassingly bad state, I went ahead and "was bold" and nominated it for deletion. Hooverdan (talk)

If you think it has so many problems, please make a start on fixing them yourself. Poor quality on its own is not a reason for deletion. --NSH001 (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely disagree with any suggestion that the article should be deleted. Although I tend to side with Horwill and Daniels rather than Lydiard on their areas of disagreement, I think that Lydiard was definitely of sufficient importance as a coach to merit a Wikipedia article. With regard to the very old 'citations needed' tag at the start of the article, most of what is in the article could be referenced to the biography on http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/6l3/lydiard-arthur-leslie (which is cited as an external link) AlanD1956 (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arthur Lydiard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arthur Lydiard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050201114654/http://lydiard.co.nz/ to http://www.olympic.org.nz/nzolympic/athlete/arthur-lydiard
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.athletics.org.nz/Article.aspx?Id=1536

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why

...are the longstanding, and textually long sections of this article allowed to remain, long devoid of a single citation? Is it not immediately clear to editors—though not necessarily our naive readers—that this violates core principles of WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH and/or WP:VERIFY? To speak plainly, why does Wikipedia serve as a ready example of WP:PLAGIARISM, to all of the English-speaking, education-seeking world? 2601:246:C700:2:412F:EEB2:43D2:4349 (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]