Talk:Assertive community treatment

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Quotes Removed

REMOVED THE QUOTES FROM "COERCIVE" AS DR. TOMI GOMORY ARGUES DIRECTLY THAT IT IS COERCIVE, LITERALLY, NOT "COERCIVE" AND THERE ARE MANY PUBLICATIONS TO BACK UP THIS CONCEPT.

how can ACT be inherently coercive when at least one ACT team i am aware of is a voluntary program, which does not mandate medications? IF ACT is part of an inpatient unit, or some other mandated program, i can see issues of coercion, but thats a problem with the boundary between coercion and voluntary treatment across all areas of mental health, and not unique to ACT inherently.12.125.80.214 (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ACT Teams

I was proud to start up and oversee and ACT team in WV for 3 years. It is a fantastic program as long as all the team members are on the same page. It also requires the support of the executive level, if this is not there, then the team will no be beneficial to the clients.

ACT Rocks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.234.21.50 (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Juvenile enthusiasm and trivial comments do nothing to convince anyone of the value of Assertive Community Treatment.

Prideful and pebbly remarks are of little value. Gingermint (talk) 07:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

case management (mental health) needed

any thoughts or interest in creating a mental health focused case management article and helping with a merge? Talk:Case management#disambiguation and merge needed. Already have the key references at Talk:Case management#significant use of term in mental health Earlypsychosis (talk) 02:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Case management now completed included a mental health concept. --Earlypsychosis (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger?

I don't really know anything about this topic, but it appears that Program of Assertive Community Treatment is covering the same material. Should the two be merged? Maybe just redirect the PACT page here. Anyone strongly opposed to that? --Dual Freq (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - ACT is a generic term referring to a treatment modality or service delivery approach. It covers all programs that offer intensive community treatment for the mentally ill. PACT is a specific program developed at the Mendota Mental Health Institute in Madison, Wisconsin. Think about as similar to the difference between tissue and Kleenex or gelatin and Jello or vacuum cleaner and Hoover. 32.218.46.21 (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason that a specific program can't be redirected and discussed here. It is already discussed in more detail here than on the stub page. --Dual Freq (talk) 13:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to NAMI [1] :

Is there a difference between PACT and ACT? There is no difference between the PACT (Program of Assertive Community Treatment) model and the ACT (Assertive Community Treatment) model. Not only does NAMI use PACT and ACT interchangeably, but PACT or ACT is also known by other names across the country. For example, in Wisconsin, ACT programs are called Community Support Programs, or CSP. In Florida, ACT programs are called FACT (Florida Assertive Community Treatment); in Rhode Island and Delaware ACT programs are called Mobile Treatment Teams (MTT), while Virginia uses PACT for its assertive community treatment teams. While the official name that a state, county, or locality uses for ACT varies widely, there is only one set of standards that NAMI sets forth for all programs of assertive community treatment.
— National Alliance on Mental Illness

--Dual Freq (talk) 13:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support we'd do better by a more inclusive article covering a broader area - there is not enough distinction or uniqueness for PACT to warrant a separate article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Cas. These are discussible within the same article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support details related to the development of PACT are already included in this article. Dual Freq's point about the greater discussion of PACT here furthers Cas' argument for an inclusive article. —Shelley V. Adams ‹blame
credit› 16:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then I will redirect Program of Assertive Community Treatment to here. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Assertive community treatment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Assertive community treatment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.locusonline.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616162248/http://www.academyhealth.org/ to http://www.academyhealth.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]