Talk:BP (disambiguation)

Berlin Philharmoniker?

Berlin Philharmoniker?--达伟 (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Opposition based on Primary Topic is strong - clearly no consensus to move. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 17:44, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BP (disambiguation) → BP
BP → BP p.l.c.

– BP links directly to the article on British Petroleum, but BP is also used in science - Geology, Evolution, .. - to indicate "Before Present"; so when someone inserts a BP link, shouldn't it be triggered that the author makes a choice to which BP ? Thy SvenAERTS (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SvenAERTS and Iffy: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the request for you, but this is in no way an uncontroversial request. Iffy★Chat -- 15:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And page BP now is the article about British Petroleum company. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. BP as the company name is the most common use of BP. And there is no company named British Petroleum already more than 20 years. Beagel (talk) 17:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The mere fact that BP can have other meanings doesn’t mean the energy company cannot be the primary topic. Calidum 17:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The oil company is by far the most common use of "BP". Dormskirk (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The company seems to be primary[[1]] and Before Present doesn't seem to be known primarily by this, while the company is. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PTOPIC says that it has to be "more likely than all the other topics combined". That pageviews link only compares BP (41,012) against Before Present (596). That's enough to raise one's blood pressure (55,885) or, as Baden-Powell (15,183) might say, "Go at it!": but where to go? The Solomon Islands (32,609) or Bletchley Park (15,555)?

Fortunately, of course, we don't just consider pageviews. 89.147.70.233 (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think people looking for blood pressure will type in BP? Calidum 21:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And in particular do you think people looking for Bletchley Park will type "BP"? I can't imagine myself doing so, although it may have been more commonly known by that when it was first publicized. My oppose is still weak since Google also does give some results for blood pressure but I don't think I've ever heard if it being referred to like that. Also if this is done the company will need to be moved, maybe BP p.l.c. or BP (company) (I have changed this to a multi-move). Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since BP (disambiguation) gets about a twentieth of the the hits that BP does, I should say that people don't expect to find Bletchley Park, blood pressure etc at "BP". Less certain are some of the redirects: B. P. and B-P redirect to Robert Baden-Powell, B.P. and Bp. to BP (disambiguation), yet Bp, B P and B.p. redirect to BP - who ever refers to the company that way? 89.147.70.233 (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but move the article to BP (company) - "BP p.l.c." is a very unnatural way to title an article. I have an extremely high threshold to allow any topic to be primary when it comes to two- and three-letter acronyms, because I feel we serve readers and editors much more by leaving disambiguation pages at those. The BP (oil company) article is not "more likely than all the other topics combined" to be WP:PRIMARY over so many other uses for the usage or abbreviation "BP". -- Netoholic @ 23:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – no primarytopic. Most people in the world don't know BP the company even if they buy their gas. Move BP to BP (company) as Netoholic suggests. Dicklyon (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BP (company) falls under WP:PDAB, though, as Boston Pizza is also a company known as "BP". 89.147.70.233 (talk) 07:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SvenAERTS:: "Shouldn't it be triggered that the author makes a choice to which BP ?" — the editor should check the link, per WP:TESTLINK. 89.147.70.233 (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose. Vastly overwhelming primary topic. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - company is primary topic.--Staberinde (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Clear primary topic and common name (and it would be BP plc actually). -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.