Talk:Bakshi Jagabandhu

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Odisha Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha (assessed as Mid-importance).

Birth and Death year

IN the picture of Bakshi jagabandhu birth year and death year is mentioned in odiya. Since I dont know odiya I request someone to find and mention the dates in the infobox Balaji (talk) 04:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

updated--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bakshi Jagabandhu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312004826/http://as.ori.nic.in/gis/khurda/paik.htm to http://as.ori.nic.in/gis/khurda/paik.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisation by solarson919

This user has been adding unsourced content to this page and also removing reliable sources that has been cited in this article, he's violating Wikipedia policies for caste glorification, editors plz take a look at it.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]

Which policies do you claim are being violated? 331dot (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Just one question isn't removing reliable sources from pages and adding unsourced content unto it count as violation of Wikipedia's policies,as wikipedia is meant to share free knowledge to others not false information for our own benefit.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]

You can take a look at the page's history the fellow user has removed references from the page which goes against his will,he also inserted unsourced information unto to the page for the glorification of a particular community.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]

Removing a source in and of itself is not a violation of policy. The reason for doing so may be, or if no reason is given. You do misunderstand what Wikipedia is for- it is not merely for sharing knowledge, but for summarizing independent reliable sources. No claims are made about the truthfulness of the information presented, see WP:TRUTH. 331dot (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

But the user not only removed a source but also inserted information which is not present in other sources that have been already cited on this page,the additional information he inserted is not complying with other sources that are already present in the article,so my question is whether unsourced content be allowed in Wikipedia even if it's not complying with the information of the sources cited in the article.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]

Unsourced content may be removed, if that is indeed the case, but first there should be an attempt to engage the other user in discussion to both hear their side and perhaps get them to understand yours, in order to achieve a consensus. 331dot (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Exactly addition of unsourced content to this page is the issue, I'll try to open a discussion with the fellow user let's see what he has to say for the recent addition of unsourced content on this page by him.( AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) )[reply]

Please note how this section is formatted(with colons at the start of each comment) and remember to sign your posts. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]