Talk:Battle for Bittora
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]there is a movie by this title and a book. there might need to be disambiguation. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Suggestion for Renaming the novel and movie pages
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Battle for Bittora turned into a dab, history that used to be located there and was merged to Battle for Bittora (film) is now located at Battle For Bittora (film). Jenks24 (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- Battle for Bittora: Anuja Chauhan → Battle for Bittora (novel)
- Battle for Bittora → Battle for Bittora (film)
– Is clearer than what is happening now. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 03:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest you change the second proposal to Battle for Bittora (film). We don't disambiguate with (movie). --BDD (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Done. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support per nom, though per MOS, use Battle for Bittora (film) instead -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- On second thought, move Battle For Bittora to Battle for Bittora (film), and merge Battle for Bittora to that article, since the "For" article is older and longer. -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think I know what you mean, but could you restate your idea just to be clear? Also, could link a similar situation so I could consider what's your proposal? ForbiddenRocky (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Merge Battle for Bittora into -> Battle For Bittora
- Move Battle For Bittora to -> Battle for Bittora (film)
- Does that make it clearer ? -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 07:16, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think I know what you mean, but could you restate your idea just to be clear? Also, could link a similar situation so I could consider what's your proposal? ForbiddenRocky (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- On second thought, move Battle For Bittora to Battle for Bittora (film), and merge Battle for Bittora to that article, since the "For" article is older and longer. -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- BTW, as proposer, Support ForbiddenRocky (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Since the film did not require a RM, I went ahead and moved it per WP:NCF. IMO, the novel already has sufficient disambiguation as is. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 7 February 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Ultimately unopposed after a couple of weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Battle for Bittora (novel) → Battle for Bittora – Only one article with this name, so parenthetical disambiguation is not needed. This article would remain the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC even if an article is later created for the film, because the film is based on the novel. — Gorthian (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - honestly can't see there's a rush here, it's highly probably that the film will go ahead and an article will be created even if the name changes http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/work-on-battle-for-bittora-has-started-sonam-kapoor-3105095/ In ictu oculi (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- No rush intended or needed. — Gorthian (talk) 03:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.