This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Pardon me, but if this is an attempt at translation of the name of Krbava field it's ludicrous (especially without corroboration). For all we know, the field is named after the river Krbava. Therefore I've deleted it. If that's some poetic take on the name, it's still out of place here (any battlefield could be named "the field of blood") Zoran M10:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The loss figures of Croatian side don't seem realistic. The strength of the army is 8000 infantry and 2000-3000 cavalry. That makes 10000-11000. The loss is 8000-10000 killed and 1500 POW. The higher limit is more than the total strength. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]