Talk:Battle of McDowell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBattle of McDowell has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 26, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the Battle of McDowell, Confederate soldiers attempted to use the dead bodies of their comrades to build breastworks?

Article source[edit]

The text of this article is virtually verbatim from the public domain NPS source cited in the References, which is a problem according to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches. I have added the appropriate citations, but a general rewrite is in order. I will put this on my to do list, but other assistance in solicited in the meantime. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And 11 years later, it has been rewritten. Hog Farm (talk) 04:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Battle of McDowell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing forces[edit]

I have done a similar thing here that I just did to First Kernstown, viz., placing the orders of battle directly on the main page, meaning we can delete the separate OOB pages. If no one objects, I will tag those for removal in a few days. (BTW, no objected when I deleted the Kernstown OOBs, so I assume everyone's on board with this change.) Hungrydog55 (talk) 20:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing forces[edit]

I have reverted the movement of the orders of battle into the main page, as has been contested at several other pages. See Talk:Battle_of_Wilson's_Creek#Opposing_forces for a similar discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 01:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]