Talk:Be More

Be More has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 22, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Cartoon Network Low‑importance

	Cartoon Network portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Be More (Adventure Time)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I shall review this, hopefully within the next few days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Link storyboarding
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The lead mentions BMO without explaining who he is (like you did for the others). Consider adding brief blurb about him?
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No need to link Tompkins and McCann twice in lead; in fact, you can just remove the second mention of them (in the second paragraph)
Removed!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What makes this a reliable source? I've never heard of the site before.
It's a Q&A-type site. The person I'm citing, "MrMuto", is Adam Muto, the show's co-executive producer. He answers fan questions about aspects of the show through the site.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And is "For unknown reasons," your interpretation or the source's? (I'm having trouble accessing it).
I just removed it, since I could see how it was close to POV.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know I inevitably ask this for many Adventure Time episodes, but aren't there any other reviews you can use? Does IGN review the show? Or EW? io9?
It's kind of spotty. More recent episodes have been reviewed by io9, but not this one. Only A.V. Club did it, as of now.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"The episode first saw physical release..." -- "Physical" seems odd. Try "commercial release"?
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You use "episode" quite a bit in the article, which can make reading it a little boring; could you try sprinkling in other words (such as installment, or just using the episode's title more often?)
I deleted a few repetitions of the word.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will place review on hold for usual 7 days. I'll check back here once you've replied to my comments for a final run-through. Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 01:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How do these changes look?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I did some digging too for anything else on this episode via Google, and nothing really came up. You did a good job exhausting the existing sources. Nice work! Passing now. I'm not sure if AT DVDs include special features on episode production, but that might be a good place to also look). Ruby 2010/2013 01:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Be More (Adventure Time). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]