Talk:Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500–1800

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Islam

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Examples of how different things are

From Ibrahim p. 482:

"As the author notes, it is hard to imagine Sinatra singing about “his love for a downy-cheeked boy of fourteen” (77) in more contemporary societies where such desires are condemned and criminalised."

This may be a good example to cite in an article discussing pederasty in the Middle East WhisperToMe (talk) 05:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bullough source states: "Women, because they cannot penetrate, were not considered capable of being homosexual." - May be good to discuss in the Samar Habib book (if I can make an article about it) WhisperToMe (talk) 09:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More from El-Rouayeb

El-Rouayeb, Khaled. "Dror Ze'evi on the Sexual Discourses of the Early Modern Ottoman World" (Archive) (Book review). MRZine. 14 February 2008.

This isn't about this book, but it may be useful as a book to write another Wikipedia article on. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes on Eich

Eich p. 227:

In regards to Thomas Mann: "At the same time it would be at least premature to describe the person as well as the writings of Thomas Mann as out wardly "homosexual". In other words it seems far from clear "what we might be inclined to call homosexual behaviour or sentiments" today, to use el-Rouayheb's expression once again."
Same page: "For example, a study could not avoid being suspected of grouping together what does not neces sarily belong together if it were to write the history of 20th-century "homosexuality" by using, among other things, the lyrics of Skin (from the rock band Skunk Anansie) or Melissa Etheridge, which form a striking parallel to many of the homoerotic Arabic poems studied by el-Rouayheb, because they are mostly void of any explicit lesbian content; the writings of Thomas Mann; and newspaper clippings covering the public debate about the introduction of so-called "homo-marriage" under Germany's former red-green government."

This is why I use all book reviews, so Wikipedians have a clear picture of any possible pitfalls. And please don't just take my word for it - Please find ways to obtain these book reviews so you can read them and plan how to use these sources WhisperToMe (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Before Homosexuality in the Arab‐Islamic World, 1500-1800" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Before Homosexuality in the Arab‐Islamic World, 1500-1800 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 29 § Before Homosexuality in the Arab‐Islamic World, 1500-1800 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:14, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]