Talk:Belfield FM

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 April 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Belfieldfm16 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Ryanfortune9 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Nibbihak (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
Reckon Her (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belfield FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219221918/http://www.collegetribune.ie:80/index.php/2012/02/possibility-of-belfield-fm-society-being-formed/ to http://www.collegetribune.ie/index.php/2012/02/possibility-of-belfield-fm-society-being-formed/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Belfield FM logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of Interest and NOTWEBHOST[edit]

In a series of edits last year, and to address a number of concerns raised by multiple editors (including during a related AfD discussion), much of the problematic content in this article was removed. Including most of the promotional, "Wikipedia as an extension of the subject's own website", apparent COI/vanity, inappropriate broadcast schedule, unqualified editorial, apparent nonsense/vandalism and generally uncited and editorial content.

Earlier today, much of it was restored. Including the apparent hoax/vandalism about the subject's "sister station" being the International Space Station, the editorial about the subject's output being "wide" "varied" and "popular", the promotional tone taken in describing the "great success" in being nominated for awards, the uncited and out-of-scope lists of programs and broadcast times, and uncited "list of every staff-member ever". In restoring this content, many of the references (added to the article since) were removed.

I have reverted these edits. For the reasons above. And those noted in the relevant edit summary.

If there is justification for restoring this content, and removing the relevant references, then I am happy to discuss that rationale here. I would otherwise remind involved editors of the policies against editing Wikipedia in their own interest or considering Wikipedia to be a form of free webhost for their own organisation.

Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 17:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]