Jump to content

Talk:Benson Polytechnic High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alumni

[edit]

How do you prove someone went to this high school? Wikipedia requires proof, before allowing links. The person is a published mathematician... but Benson has no online tool that can prove attendance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffeeman2727 (talkcontribs) 18:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this relates to Kenneth L. Clarkson. Thanks for your message on my Talk page, too. I'm not getting anywhere with finding a reliable source confirming his attendance at this school, so I think we're stuck, at least for the moment. If the mathematician receives more coverage, interviews perhaps, we may find something we can add in the future. The article about him is mainly sourced to his papers, so there's not anything we can use there. Tacyarg (talk) 10:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Older comments

[edit]

This image is way too big for the page. --Liface 18:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind that, I found a better one. --Liface 18:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good article. What are Benson's athletic teams' colors? Just wondering. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DukTape (talkcontribs) 10:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

School's Colors, Team names, and inacurate information

[edit]

To answer a question that was put on the talk page, the school's colors are Orange and Blue.

The school has two team names, Techmen (for the men) and Techsters (for the women).

Also, the school didn't have a lottery because of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), but some of the North Portland Schools, including their rival, Jefferson, were complaining because Benson was taking "Their best students from the area"

Citation to come--Rabbitdude 22:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a recent article from a twice-weekly newspaper [1]--Rabbitdude 21:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bensonlogo.gif

[edit]

Image:Bensonlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rating

[edit]

I'm rating this school as mid for both WikiProject Oregon and WikiProject Schools. My rationale is that the school is somewhat unique as a public tech prep school with a rich history. tedder (talk) 06:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from pps website

[edit]

Swaths of this page seem to be copied directly from http://www.bensonhs.pps.k12.or.us/old/aboutBenson/index.html PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 07:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it appears to be the other-way around. Benson (likely the students) copied the Wikipedia text. If you look at the Benson history website, the properties say it was created last November, while much of the Wikipedia text has been around for 7 years. What's more telling is if you compare the 2005 Wikipedia version to the current version, there are some improvements to the Wikipedia article that has largely the same text, but the Benson history website has the newer text from the Wikipedia article. As in it would be odd to copy and paste back in 2005 from the Benson website and then make the same improvements/changes. Some items for comparison: "Benson became co-educational once in September 1973." from the 2005 Wikipedia article, while the current Wikipedia article and Benson site have the "again" added. "An arson's fire destroyed offices and classrooms in the main section of Benson on January 3, 1991." from the 2005 version, while both the current Wikipedia article and Benson site change it to "An arsonist’s fire". Further, the Wayback machine has no captures of the Benson History site (well it didn't until I tried to check older versions which made it do a capture then), so I think it is safe to say that is a fairly new page (though maybe just a new URL). Also, older versions of Benson's overall site have links to the Wikipedia article. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Benson Polytechnic High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]