Talk:Berlusconism
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Requested move 18 October 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 16:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Berlusconism → ''Berlusconismo'' – While there are examples of usage of the word "Berlusconism" in English (see this Google search), it is not true that the term in English is often used by foreign mainstream media. I only found examples of the English-language term in one book (G. Orsina, Berlusconism and Italy. A Historical Interpretation) and a few academic papers. Since it is widely more used as "Berlusconismo" in Italian mainstream media and academia, it is probably better to use the Italian name as title. Ritchie92 (talk) 10:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:UE. A Google book search turns up quite a few instances of Berlusconism used in English-language books. I'm not sure why we would want to use Italian when an English word is widely used in English-language sources. Berlusconismo would be fine as a redirect though. Station1 (talk) 16:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Passive support Like the Chavismo article, it would be better to use the locally used terms as the title of the article. However, in the case of Liberism, I don't know what to do.--Storm598 (talk) 13:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The English term "Berlusconism" is used in several sources (like Craxism), I don't see the necessity to move the page.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 14:14, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.