Talk:Black Versace dress of Elizabeth Hurley
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A fact from Black Versace dress of Elizabeth Hurley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Rare
[edit]I'd say that the giant gold safety pins made the dress "unusual" or "unique" rather than "rare." I understand the intention but I don't think it's the best word. PurpleChez (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing. Bradley0110 (talk) 19:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah me too Hurley0110 (talk) 20:59, 24 Febooary 2015 (UTC)
this acutally didnt get a lot of press and hyped up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.51.238 (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Met exhibit
[edit]Can someone work this into the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Pic
[edit]Just suggest this pic: http://brianatwoodsale.info/image/201012221817412521.jpg
--95.236.123.133 (talk) 11:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
An article about a dress?
[edit]How was this not speedily deleted? 12.200.60.7 (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm going to kill myself now... 95.36.55.104 (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Got to agree. An article about a dress? Sorry, but this is ridiculous... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.204.134 (talk) 01:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- WP:BIAS. The dress is more important than List of Pokémon (252–319) or anything on this chart; it just seems less relevant to you because you don't follow fashion. — LlywelynII 05:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Got to agree. An article about a dress? Sorry, but this is ridiculous... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.204.134 (talk) 01:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)