Jump to content

Talk:Golden lancehead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Bothrops insularis)

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was do not move Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why no photo?

[edit]

This Snake is all over the news lately as is the Island and this page is linked to in the articles on other websites. I was hoping to see a photo. I know there are oftenproblems with getting a properly copyright-free pic, but it would be great to have one for this snake. LiPollis (talk) 01:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fatalities?

[edit]

The idea that no fatality from a bite has been recorded is contradictory to information found elsewhere on wikipedia, see Ilha da Queimada Grande — Preceding unsigned comment added by OMolokaiO (talkcontribs) 11:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't currently seem to be anything currently in the Ilha da Queimada Grande that contradicts that. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 September 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Bothrops insularisGolden lancehead – Per WP:NCFAUNA, vernacular names should usually be used. This species has a single unambiguous vernacular name, and a case-insensitive NGram shows that the vernacular name is more commonly used in recent English-language books than the scientific name. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So it does. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.