Jump to content

Talk:British Rail Class 387

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 387. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 11:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I think this is the forum to discuss changes rather than getting into a bun fight. I have reinserted replacement of class 317, 321 as at the moment that is the situation, as these units become available they are taking the rosters from the 317/321 units. These unit are then going off lease and maybe being scraped.

From 2018, maybe sooner, class 387's will be mainly used on the Kings Cross to Cambridge & King's Lynn displacing 365. Class 365 will be used for other services on Great Northern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyMo (talk • contribs) 20:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 387. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems ok Dr Sludge (talk) 07:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heathrow Express / GWR Units

[edit]

Without wishing to create an edit war...

The numbers on the fleet details section do not add up. You can't have 130-142 (13 units) if only 12 units are being modified.

Can someone please confirm exactly which units are being modified for HEX work, and update the article accordingly, with numbers that actually match up TC60054 (talk) 20:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great Northern units.

[edit]

according to Great Northern them self's they have 65 class 387s in service. https://twitter.com/GNRailUK/status/1678535146738204674?s=20 I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would account for the missing 387202-204 in the fleet table... I'm hesitant to add them though, as they haven't specified whether they're deployed with GN or Gatwick Express. An alternative would be to combine the GN and GE fields in the fleet table. Danners430 (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Danners430 Maybe it is best to combine them under Govia Thameslink Railway and then that fixes all issues interims of which units are with who. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:British_Rail_Class_387&oldid=1200369282"