Talk:Brocade
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
architectr
[edit]brocade is also an architecture term. -- 68.160.163.28 07:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Difference between Brocade and Damask
[edit]What's the exact difference between Brocade and Damask. Anyone knows? Gugganij (talk) 19:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Brocade and Damask are typically used to mean the same thing. The method of making them is the same, so the fabrics are really the same, but the patterns are different. Brocade patterns typically use metallic treads and more contrast. Another difference is that Brocade is a usually single sided fabric (the pattern only looks good on one side) and Damask is reversible (pattern looks good on both sides). WFDobbs (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Additionally - Technically (and traditionally), the patterns in brocade use one or more supplemental wefts to create a pattern in multiple colors; damasks are usually produced with a single warp and and a single weft and the pattern is monochrome (or one color for warp and one for weft). That is what makes damasks look the same on both sides. Many brocades have a damask ground. - PKM (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the request for photos from this page because it now has three. If any specific kinds of photos are wanted, please put the template back and add a note explaining what you want. Thanks! FreplySpang 22:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Brokat 3.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Brokat 3.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
Ancient Chinese brocade
[edit]The article on Chengdu says brocade was made there in the 3rd Century AD. If this is true, surely this article should start its timeframe with Antiquity, not the Middle Ages. 78.86.61.94 (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brocade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070423170649/http://libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org:80/Netherlands/treasures_en.xml to http://libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org/Netherlands/treasures_en.xml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)