Jump to content

Talk:Brunswick Line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rolling stock

[edit]

I'm pretty sure 874/877 uses more than six cars. —Wrathchild (talk) 15:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top Importance?

[edit]

What is the rationalisation for this project being so important? 86.24.193.136 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not, I changed it to mid importance. Thanks, C628 (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Refactor and userfy

[edit]

I'm a railfan, and found the Rolling Stock section confusing. It needs userfied to explain some of the differences the Trains buff author apparently is knowledge everyone knows. TEACH, don't document and call it writing.

  • Similarly, does that section belong so high in the article. Again, least interesting to the general reader stumbling onto the page. Should be down one section more, if not two. Rolling stock only matters to the kind of railfan known as rivet counters. Even most railfans agree that is extreme! (No doubt make good 3D V-scale content creators if they don't overdue the polys!) // FrankB 21:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brunswick Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]