Talk:Buckypaper

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of advertising[edit]

In line with WP:SOAP I have edited the first paragraph to remove a reference to a specific research group.Azo bob 10:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-writing of the background section[edit]

In the background information, there is too much about buckminsterfullerene, which is mainly irrelevant, and not enough about the discovery by Sumio Iijima of nanotubes. I propose that this section is completely re-written to shift the emphasis towards nanotubes. I wanted to gauge opinion before attempting this.Azo bob 10:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to discuss Iijima here. Not that he isn't important to nanotubes, but that he isn't relevant in an efficient description of Buckypaper. The only reason BuckminsterFullerne is mentioned is to understand the etymology of the term 'Buckpaper', and frankly in its current form it is kind of confusing to read. This section probably should be rewritten (or removed entirely). The only background really needed is a link to carbon nanotubes, from there you can figure out the etymology. -Hellkyte —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.7.123.51 (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"conducts electricity like silicon or copper"[edit]

um, which? These do not have the same conductivity, copper is a conductor, silicon is a semiconductor. I know this is a citation from an article, but it isn't logical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.65.98 (talk) 16:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise for Steel or Brass on thermal conductivity, Brass is about 4x that of steel. What is worse is below in the application section it implies that the thermal conductivity is extraordinary which neither steel or brass are. -- nicklinn (talk / contribs) 02:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buckypaper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061211120613/http://www.tfot.info:80/content/view/74/61/ to http://www.tfot.info/content/view/74/61/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]