Talk:Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season Nine

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Television: Buffyverse Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Buffyverse task force.

Comics: United States Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Whose idea..?!

Whose idea was it to merge ALL the comics in one page, with the different details of single issues?!! Angel and Faith should has its own page!.. This wiki entry is too long. Mando Salama (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's about each article identifying its real-world notability. As amazing as a comic as it is, Angel & Faith doesn't get the real world attention of the main title and—you'll note—all the comics belong to one Season Nine meta-series/brand with a single development and production history, not to mention numerous crossovers, which meant that one article made a lot of sense. Generally, Season Nine has had less attention than Season Eight, which is presumably the main reason why individual story arcs haven't had articles written for them. It's also not too long; the article is rather underweight where it counts. I'm not opposed to splitting the page on principle, but I have to ask: what sources would you put forward to justify doing so?Zythe (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting might be more tenable now

Now that it's been announced that Angel & Faith is set to get a volume 2 to go alongside Buffy Season Ten, one way we could structure this is as an Angel & Faith article which covers both seasons. Then we'd have articles for S8, S9, A&F (all volumes, like an X-Men book), and S10. Thoughts, anyone?Zythe (talk) 08:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Someone update 'collected editions'

Preferably seperared between spin offs GraphicPup (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season Nine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]