Talk:Bulgaria Air

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bulgaria Air article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airline project.

Destinations

Hey guys, I have a question, to save space, why is the a destinations list when we have a perfect functional destinations page? I infact propose that we remove the drop-box/list and use the destinations page instead. Thank you Joey Boeing 777 (talk) 20:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

Stop reverting edits unless you have evidence to support it! I have backed up my evidence which is becoming obvious you have not checked. Can you not read English? If not why use this wikipedia? Regards, Zaps93 (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FB 1234.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:FB 1234.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of unsourced and tagged text

As per the Wikipedia policy at WP:V, which says, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." I have removed text that was challenged and tagged as needing a ref back in May. Another editor keeps putting the unsourced text back in. If this information is correct it should be easy to find refs. If there are no refs then it is likely that this information is wrong or that it is just a form of vandalism. Unsourced text that has been tagged cannot by reinstated without refs added. Constant reinsertion of unsourced text will be considered vanadalism. - Ahunt (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, WP:BURDEN reads "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quite true, thanks for adding that. - Ahunt (talk) 13:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bulgaria Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.air.bg/en/news%26id%3D150
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150410015457/http://chronicle.bg/air-berlin-i-bulgaria-air-podpisaha-sporazumenie-za-kod-sher/ to http://chronicle.bg/air-berlin-i-bulgaria-air-podpisaha-sporazumenie-za-kod-sher/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]