Talk:Børsen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Børsen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Børsen was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 16 April 2024.

Wikipedia

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New article about fire

Please make new stand-alone article about the fire titled "Børsen fire," in Danish "Brænden på Børsen". Begin something like: On April 16, 2024 at 7:36 CET, a fire was reported in Børsen, a 17th-century stock exchange in the center of Copenhagen, Denmark. Background: location, build by Christian IV in 1619–1640 and so on Domestic reactions: the king and queen, PM Mette Frederiksen, members of Folketinget and so one. International reactions: French, British, German, Norwegian and Swedish media. The comparison to Notre Dame in Paris. Fire: it was declared extinguished at ??:?? Links: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68824189 https://abcnews.go.com/International/fire-rips-stock-exchange-building-copenhagen-people-rescue/story?id=109293831 https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/16/style/copenhagen-old-stock-exchange-fire-intl/index.html https://www.nrk.no/urix/borsen-i-kobenhavn-star-i-brann-1.16845626 https://www.svt.se/nyheter/snabbkollen/storbrand-i-anrika-borsen-i-kopenhamn https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2024/04/16/la-bourse-de-copenhague-au-danemark-est-en-feu_6228121_3210.html https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/live-brand-i-boersen-i-koebenhavn https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2024-04-16-ti-kobbersmede-var-paa-taget-da-alarmen-gik-nogle-graed-da-de-kom-ned

Assesment of the damage: Rebulding: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.96.25.164 (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A new separate article can be made when there is sufficient new information. For now, there is only enough info to fill a section of the main article. Please be patient. Cart (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that there is still no need for a separate article, I will undo the split that just resulted in duplicatation and a stub. Reywas92^Talk 13:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One existed just yesterday, but the article was merged into this one today. There is not sufficient information to create a whole new article, but maybe in the future. Wikipubliceditorpro (talk) 18:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have a grand total of four paragraphs of content on the fire, none of which are very long. Just because you can divide some into single-sentence sections does not mean there is enough content to warrant a split at this point. Keep expanding here first and we can split later – let's try to avoid removing content that would still be relevant here without expecting readers to go to two articles and also avoid duplication. Reywas92^Talk 13:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Danish wikipedia does have a separate article on the fire (dk:Branden i Børsen), but the Danish article on the Børsen dk:Børsen is about twice the size of the English one, and the information in the article on the fire is about twice-ish what we have in the section. My feeling is to use expand the english article using the Danish one as a model and *when* the information on the fire gets to where the Danish one is (or close), it probably should get split. I am *not* expecting the article on the fire to reach the size of the Notre-Dame fire, but that doesn't mean that it won't eventually be its own article. It's not really a WP:TOOSOON though, I have no doubt that it will be possible within the next week to have such an article, especially if the article on the Børsen expands as well.Naraht (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number of images

This article has 28 images. Can we do some trimming here? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence

Two quibbles about this first sentence:

Børsen (Danish for "the bourse"), also known as Børsbygningen ("the bourse building"), is a 17th-century stock exchange in the centre of Copenhagen, ...

I am not sure Børsbygningen is ever used, except occasionally (rarely) as a description rather than a name in contexts where just Børsen might be misunderstood to mean the modern stock exchange. I don't think it deserves a mention here.
In the 17th century, it was afaik not a stock exchange, but it was for sure a commodity exchange. It was, however, stock exchange in a period from 1857(?) to 1974.

The Danish word Børs (bourse) or Børsen (the bourse) has triple meanings: (i) a place where things are traded (good, securities or whatever); (ii) specifically a stock exchange; (iii) this specific historic building in Copenhagen, that was originally børs in the 1st sense, and at a later period in the 2nd. Nø (talk) 07:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've now changed the first sentence accordingly. Nø (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]