Talk:Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Broadcasting / Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Broadcast engineering and technology task force.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Replies

Hi! Sorry again for the slow response, but I'm finally home and can answer the rest of your questions. Some of what I'm going to post here is copied and pasted from my partial reply on my talk page, while the rest of it is in response to your other questions. References should be inline, not on a separate page. Sources that you're citing should be footnoted inline, although if you're using multiple pages from one reference (say a book or a long journal article) in different areas you can use a short format inline and give the full reference information in a separate section. See Cleveland Bay for an example of the short/long formatting that I'm talking about - completely different subject, but same general idea. Just using links, like you currently have, is not usually a good idea. They easily go dead and give the user much less information than a fully formatted ref. This is especially true for the ebscohost articles. Because that is a subscription database, many readers do not have access to it. In this case, you should provide a full citation to the journal article (I use the {{cite journal}} template, but you can also do it manually), and then provide a courtesy web link if you wish, although this isn't mandatory.

If you feel that the page should be moved because it is not at the proper name, go ahead and do it. At the top of the page, next to the read, edit and history tabs is a downward pointing arrow. If you run your cursor over this, one of the options that pops up is "move". Click on this and follow the directions to make the move - just be sure to read carefully. If you have any problems let me know and I can clean up, but remember that it's pretty much impossible to "break" the wiki - anything can be undone. I hope these answers help, but please let me know if you need further explanation. I'm watching this article and the talk page, so you can ask any questions you have here, or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another thought on seeing your recent edits: Remember that the lead is supposed to be a summary of what is contained in the rest of the article, and is generally not cited other than quotes and truly controversial information. See WP:LEAD for further information on this guideline, or check out some featured articles for examples. Dana boomer (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dana,my name is walla2jl. Your article looks like it is coming along well. I copy edited the "Brief History" section, just making a few small gramatical changes. I would recommend linking some of your key phrases to other wikipedia articles to make it more user friendly to people who want to know more about some of the things you are mentioning. Great work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walla2jl (talk • contribs) 20:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name, Cable TV Privacy Act

The original title was the "Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984". See 98 Stat. 2779 (at Wikisource). This article should be renamed as such.

The Cable TV Privacy Act article gives as its source 47 U.S.C. § 551. Cornell LII gives this act, at 98 Stat. 2794 (at Wikisource), as the source. This act gives no such short title. A Google Books search gives little in the way of supporting that article either, at only 27-58 results, many referring to an Illinois (and possibly California) act by that name. Section 9 of this act gives the effect date as 60 days after enactment, which was 30 October 1984; that article gives the effective date as 29 December 1984. That article should be merged and redirected into this article.

Int21h (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]