Jump to content

Talk:Call on Me (Eric Prydz song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Love of Richard Nixon

[edit]

I deleted the statement in the first paragraph, ", stopping the Manic Street Preachers from reaching number one with "The Love of Richard Nixon"" as it didn't seem important to the article. But I don't live in the UK so it might have some significance that I am unaware of --WikiWizard 12:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No significance that I am aware of either (as a UK citizen). Otherwise all wiki-pages about number one hits may as well list the track they replaced at the top--TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy use of samples

[edit]

This song makes very heavy use of the Valerie track. It may be the first of the modern era dance tracks to so heavily feature repeated loops of one sample. Many songs have done so afterwards ("say say say" for example). Is this the first modern track to feature a looped sample so prominently, insofar as it makes up nearly the complete song? -- M.R. 11:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely not. Utah Saints "Something Good" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zU_ec1qmT0 is very similar in style, it relies on just one sample from Kate Bush's "Cloudbusting" but reworked to become a completely different song. "Believe In Me" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25mkfIBqZX0 which samples the Human League is similar. "What Can You Do For Me" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAJbBRSxg6E is their best known, but it uses three different songs instead of one. All these songs are from 1991. Anorak2 11:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PS how could I forget Boogie Pimps "Somebody To Love" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGcH6YQETys of 2003 213.73.65.62 17:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

What's the point of linking to parodies? --moyogo 18:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever removed the external links is mistaken. The parodies reflect the song's impact on the culture. The presence of these links is at least as encyclopedic as an article on the "All your Base" phenomenon.

Were they links to the parodies themselves or to reliable secondary sources covering the parodies? Stating that parodies exist without citing a reliable source mentioning them smacks of prohibited original research. --Damian Yerrick (talk) 18:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roulé/pridz problem

[edit]

Sorry for my english, i'm french. Feel free to correct my aproximative english in the article. I made a minor edit about the origin of the track. As a dj, i received the white label from thomas bangalter/dj falcon -call on me, prior to its release by prydz. Then there was the clearance right problem at roulé records. The track by bangalter/falcon was almost the same. Every dj in France know the track was "stolen'. (Quite the same story as "bob sinclar - gym tonic", altough sinclar mentioned it as a "thomas bangalter remix" (even if there's no original one)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.57.253.116 (talk • contribs)

Please see WP:V. Just64helpin 18:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Callonme.jpg

[edit]

Image:Callonme.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Callonmedvd.jpg

[edit]

Image:Callonmedvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Dark

[edit]

The video also features the porn star known as Anita Dark. I can't imagine I am the first to notice this ... 122.162.148.173 (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

good for you. tildetildetildeffffuuuu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.8.56.255 (talk) 23:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
@122.162.148.173 wait! Seriously? I'm going to do some research. 2003:C5:4F27:5900:554C:5044:470D:A69B (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Side Chaining to Dynamic Processing

[edit]

This song is an excellent example of side-chaining and dynamic processing of the audio signal chain. Each time the rest of the sound ducks to make room for the base drum, it's dynamic automation at work. --Kebman (talk) 18:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Call on Me (Eric Prydz song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Call on Me (Eric Prydz song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Call on Me (Eric Prydz song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Call on Me (Eric Prydz song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Call_on_Me_(Eric_Prydz_song)&oldid=1200542312"