Talk:Castle Hackett

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Castle Hackett article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force

Notability

Lucas, please read the available sources before claiming that this doesn't have notability. There are enough sources quoted in the article already to pass the notability guidelines, and, as I said in my edit summary when I removed the notability tag, there are loads of sources (277 of them) available here that confirm notability. These aren't just web sites, they are real paper books that write about the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phil- you should know that the mere existence of a term in a source does not qualify as notable. Not all books in Google Book search meet the standards of a 'reliable source' - Some of the sources you quote, you only get a snippet view, how can you dig deeper to ensure

The larger fact remains - why is this important? No where in the article does the article come close to meeting these standards. Lucas20 (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]