Talk:Charles Bruffy

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the results from Earwig's Copyvio Detector show that

1. http://www.emusic.com/artist/-/11675805/ and http://www.theaudiodb.com/artist/132989 are obvious false positives; both web sites acknowledges Wikipedia as their source;
2. http://singers.com/choral/director/Charles-Bruffy/ seems inconclusive to me;
3. http://www.kcchorale.org/#/conductor the alleged infringement consists of trivial words (https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCharles_Bruffy&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kcchorale.org%2F%23%2Fconductor&minwords=3&minchars=13&removequotations=&removenumbers= – Earwig can't find it).

--Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

this edit appears to introduce significant amounts of the singers.com text. I'm reverting to the pre-copyvio version. Don't re-introduce that text (but other bits can be restored, if you're confident they're not infringing.) WilyD 10:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

I find it hard to accept that extensively sourced material (12 citations from 11 sources) should be removed based on some totally erroneous and some inconclusive comparisons. The article should be reverted to its version on 21 December 2014. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

That version has extensive copy-pasting from singers.com - basically the whole of "Education" and "Career" is lifted from there. That is was subsequently wikified/sourced is wholly irrelevant. Any non-infringing content can be restored, but make sure no infringing content is restored, or harsher measures will have to be employed. Note that as authors still appear in the history, it's straightforward to copy-paste any old content that's appropriately licensed. WilyD 13:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Reason for copyvio notice

This website is the source of the majority of the copyrighted material found on the reverted version of this article. The copyvio check can be found here, showing that, while not ALL of the text is copyrighted, a good percentage (I estimate about 50%) is copied. Re-adding the non-copied text is perfectly fine, but a blanket reversion is not acceptable. If a peaceful resolution cannot be reached, then a revision deletion may be necessary so users will not be tempted to simply add the text back in. Primefac (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

If there's a persistent problem, I'll apply some combination of protection, blocks, and history deletion. If someone wants to write an acceptably licensed article, the references in the history are probably valuable. WilyD 19:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the explination, apologies for the revert. As there appeared to be confusion about the copyvio and the current article is ripe for AfD I felt the revert was a suitable action as a template to work from. However, after considering the songers.com text, I agree that the revert is unacceptable. Thanks.Karst (talk) 20:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

The sources are still in the history, so I think an AfD would be foolish, and result in an easy keep. But all bridges can't be crossed until they're come upon. WilyD 15:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charles Bruffy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150212232213/http://www.anuna.ie/intro-2/ to http://www.anuna.ie/intro-2/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150212224337/http://www.lorenz.com/Results.aspx?page=1&rpp=25&title=Bruffy&voicing1=&div=&producttype=%2A&usage=&level=&pop=False&pod=True&bnew=True&bbest=False&sortorder=ASC&composer=&acap=False&series=&SearchOpt=&biblebook=&biblechapter=-1&bibleverse=-1&divwiseproduct=False&Widget=0 to http://www.lorenz.com/Results.aspx?page=1&rpp=25&title=Bruffy&voicing1=&div=&producttype=%2A&usage=&level=&pop=False&pod=True&bnew=True&bbest=False&sortorder=ASC&composer=&acap=False&series=&SearchOpt=&biblebook=&biblechapter=-1&bibleverse=-1&divwiseproduct=False&Widget=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)