Talk:Chelsea Harbour

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I came upon this earlier today, it read like a promo-feature from a glossy-freebie. It had a definite bias - as if from Chelsea - and was rich in advertising material. It lacked facts and especially background history, hence the quite erroneous impression that it is an out-post of the Royal Borough. It is not and never has been. The borough boundary has been preternally defined by the tidal Counter's Creek that morphs into 'Chelsea Creek as it merges with the Thames. I have tried to explain how the misinformation could have arisen and have begun supplying bona fide sources about this rich historic area with an interesting industrial past. It still needs much improvement. Please help.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another source of confusion about Fulham or Chelsea and - potential - political bias[edit]

It turns out that with the latest parliamentary constituency boundary changes, Sands End, of which Chelsea Harbour is a part, comes under Chelsea and Fulham (UK Parliament constituency). Moreover, Kensington, Chelsea and Fulham Conservatives on their website feature the three Sands End Hammersmith and Fulham ward councillors - who happen to be Conservative Party members - as being part of their organisation.[1] On there, the councillors' official postal address is noted as merely 'c/o' Hammersmith Town Hall in a particularly small Font. This is factually incorrect, since the councillors' address is Hammersmith Town Hall, not merely, c/o. However, this is outwith the editorial control of Wikipedia and is a matter to be taken up by the current elected administration in Hammersmith and Fulham. Nevertheless, it explains how the previous content of this article could have been constructed upon an erroneous, not to say politically biased, premise.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 01:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.kcfc.org.uk/sands-end-ward - accessed 18 October 2016

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chelsea Harbour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chelsea Harbour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]