Jump to content

Talk:Chet Edwards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Does anyone have any information about his draft status? If he graduated at 17 or 18 in 1968 or 1969, how does he not graduate until 1974 from A&M? --130.111.163.179 (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Methodist or Baptist?

[edit]

His congressional bio [1] says that he is a "lifelong Methodist" who attends two Baptist churches. Huh? How do you list that in the info box? Mooveeguy (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible vice-presidential candidate

[edit]

Although some recent sources have identified Chet Edwards as a possible running mate (vice-Presidential candidate) for Barack Obama in 2008, they are no more than rumours at the moment. Some users have been adding statements that he has been announced as Obama's running mate, which is not the case; Obama's choice has in fact not yet been announced. Please do not add this information again without a source to prove it. Terraxos (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PRO-ABORTION??

[edit]

You've got to be kidding. That is offensive. The term is pro-choice, and it should be changed immediately. 65.60.215.154 (talk) 22:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that offensive. You act as if a slur was used. Perhaps you believe pro-choice has a better connotation, but you're being melodramatic. It's not like it was listed as "Pro-Babykilling" or something like that.

Yes it is offensive.........pro-choice and pro-abortion ARE NOT synonymous. Pro-abortion is a conservative "talking point". Just because someone is pro-choice, does not mean that they think abortion is okay. Example, I believe that a woman has a choice (pro-choice) to make her own decisions regarding child birth, regardless of whether or not I believe it to be a good or bad thing. There's a big difference. Democrats call it pro-choice, Karl Rove and the republicans call it pro-abortion. Just like they like to use the "baby gets its brain sucked out" when describing abortion, even though 98% of all abortions require a pill and a period to flush away an embryo.....its all about talking points. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.87.158 (talk) 07:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you folks so offended by the use of 'pro-abortion' are equally willing to call pro-life people 'pro-life' instead of 'anti-abortion'???? Liberal spin on wikipedia amazes me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.143.90.214 (talk) 19:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Why in the world is this referenced? The last name "Edwards" is pretty common. According to the following link (who knows how reliable that is, but this is wikipedia after all), it's the 49th most common last name in the US: http://www.namestatistics.com/search.php?name=edwards&type=last

To summarize, this is a useless statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.178.12.167 (talk) 23:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve King petition

[edit]

I've started a discussion regarding the notability of a series of similar edits, including one on this article, over on my talk page: User talk:Arbor832466#Steve King petition. Please feel free to weigh in! Arbor832466 (talk) 02:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chet Edwards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chet Edwards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chet Edwards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]