This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
That's not what makes a person notable. Millions of people write books. There's nothing in this article that says anything anyone wants to know about him. Having his name at Rockford Institute is about the limit of his apparent notability. See Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline One approach to good biography is for an independent person to conduct and publish a personal interview with him. That allows personal information to be made public. Tom Ruen (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My claim is that article already establishes Chilton Williamson, Jr. as notable. If your intent here is to improve Wikipedia, why don't you improve the article as you see it needs improvement. Why extort editing efforts from me by the threat to have the article deleted? Is this what Wikipedia has come to in 2020? patsw (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomruen: The template states "If this template is removed, do not replace it." This is to allow editors to "object to deletion for any reason". Thank you for the two links! I used them to expand the article. Feel free to help out further. --Bensin (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Great! I have not searched for a birth year, so the article is in the category "Year of birth missing (living people)" until a reliable source is found. --Bensin (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]