Talk:China–Turkey relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Armenian Genocide

What is China's position on the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide? I couldnt find any info on this. --Chris48930 (talk) 02:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps China doesn't have a position on the Armenian Genocide. The current Chinese state didn't even exist at that time and China has a tendency to leave their meddling in foreign affairs to the economic sphere except in their immediate neighbourhood... of which Armenia is not a part.Simonm223 (talk) 02:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny to say that Turkish Republic also did not exist at that time, either. There was Ottoman Empire and Armenians who betrayed the state by helping the enemy states during World War I were exiled with a law issued by Committee of Union and Progress.Obuli (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just added China's response on that position to the article. The People's Daily is a mouthpiece of the government, and editorials printed by them reflects government views. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.223.241 (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About the Article

This page is about Chinese–Turkish foreign relations. Sentences like "Many Han Chinese citizen critize that Turkey makes double standard", "many Chinese accuse Turkey of secertly supporting East Turkistan independence" are not acceptable unless such accusations come from Chinese officials, goverment representatives, etc. Otherwise, the page will be flooded with silly sentences such as "many Turks think Chinese are aliens" etc.
Also, all the pharases in the article are given with references regarding both sides.Obuli (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Declined, consensus is against the move Alpha Quadrant (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

China–Turkey relations → People's Republic of China – Turkey relations — Official political name. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 15:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose that is no rationale Wikipedia doesn't use official political names for titles so why would you do that unless you also use Republic of Turkey? 207.81.170.99 (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia does use official political names for titles involving China. Please see Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Chinese)#Political_NPOV Ocaasi (talk) 02:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the proposed move. If we are going to use the official names it should be "People's Republic of China – Republic of Turkey relations". A combination of an 'official name' in one hand and a 'popular name in the other is IMHO unwise. Flamarande (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Would look silly and unnatural. If there's a giudeline that says this is what should be done, then that just proves that the guideline's silly.--Kotniski (talk) 16:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

before modern era

Ming dynasty China was aware of Ottoman style firearms and military techniques. See Musketeer#Musketeers_in_China and this source.

Chase, Kenneth Warren (2003). Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (illustrated, reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521822742. Retrieved 24 April 2014. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

http://books.google.com/books?id=esnWJkYRCJ4C&pg=PA141#v=onepage&q&f=false

trade and missle deals

http://www.chinatax.gov.cn/n2226/n2271/n2274/c77640/part/77643.pdf

http://www.worldtribune.com/2014/05/02/turkey-extends-deadline-bids-missile-defense-system/

http://www.deagel.com/Surface-to-Air-Missiles/HQ-9_a001833001.aspx

Rajmaan (talk) 01:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on China–Turkey relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090721064625/http://www.newsobserver.com:80/1635/story/1602801.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/1635/story/1602801.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Singapore 1875 Syed Omar bin Mohamed Alsagoff, Chinese Ambassador, the Turkish Ambassador, Syed Ahmad bin Shaikh Alkaff, Syed Abdulkader bin Abdulrahman Alsagoff, and another Chinese Ambassador.

https://twitter.com/OttomanArchive/status/769917575711055873

Ottoman Map of a region of China

https://twitter.com/OttomanArchive/status/742353267955535872

https://twitter.com/OttomanArchive/status/586922174142898177

Ming dynasty Ottoman musket

https://twitter.com/OttomanArchive/status/620257161642385408

https://twitter.com/alprn_oky/status/673517162615734275

Hamidiye College

https://twitter.com/OttomanArchive/status/726318297440997377

https://twitter.com/AhmarSaeed1/status/684858756216172544

Yaqub Beg

https://twitter.com/OttomanArchive/status/666910322213695488

05:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on China–Turkey relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.newsunited.com/demonstrators-throw-eggs-at-dutch-news/19852180/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110622024246/http://www.chinaembassy.org.tr/eng/ to http://www.chinaembassy.org.tr/eng/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080819220715/http://www.turkey.org.cn/ to http://www.turkey.org.cn/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]