Talk:Chippewa Valley Schools

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Information

Before you edit:
Whether you are using a user account, your own IP, or the IP of your school/library, you are bound to the rules of Wikipedia.

Editing "Chippewa Valley Schools", or any other page, maliciously (removing true info, adding biased information, etc) is in violation of Wikipedia rules. Please visit WP:RULES for more information. It should be noted that if you do break these rules, any malicious edits will be removed, and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia, either temporarily or permanently.

Revision

Please note that I have gone to a way way old version of the page. This is for a number of reasons, but primarily because all the edits between this one and the formerly most recent one were useless vandalism, including the deletion of Dakota High School, and the insertion of biased information about Chippewa Valley HS ( I believe the quote was along the lines of "CVHS is the best of the three high schools"). I have added a friendly message to the top of the talk page for all Chippewa Valley people to see, so that they don't screw up the page again (you gotta know that kids in the district are doing this stuff, if you look at the edits that were made) W IKIPEE DIO 23:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cvhs.jpg

Image:Cvhs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Panther Logo.gif

Image:Panther Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

Tagged for original research, because that's pretty much all the article is with the exception of the Dakota section, which I added refs to myself. My main concern is the "Notable Alumni" section, because all those people are not verfied, yet the section continues to grow larger. Quite simply, I have no problem with the rest of the article, just that section, I guess, and it will be removed if sources are not added. W IKIPEE DIO 22:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

WhisperToMe (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chippewa Valley Schools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Chippewa Valley Schools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up Thing

The clean-up thing at the top of the page, is 6 years old. A hundred + edits Edits later, I think it can be deleted.Panther999 (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]