Talk:Chris Myers (New Jersey politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editing practices[edit]

In the recent history of this article, it seems that half the edit summaries refer to alleged vandalism. The word is being used far too loosely. Here's what the official Wikipedia policy says:

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism—it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism.

Edit summaries should stick to the merits.

Furthermore, where there are significant disagreements, the edit summary window will often not be large enough to accommodate reasoned discussion. Editors who find themselves in an edit war should try to work the matter out on the talk page. JamesMLane t c 18:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polling[edit]

With the election over and Myers having lost, can we agree that the "Polling" section is no longer relevant? Personally, I'm in favor of removing it and just leaving the "Election results" section, although I am open to having a sentence or two describing polling trends leading up to the election within the "2008 congressional campaign" section. Let me know what you think. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the detailed recitation of polls is unnecessary. Part of the removed material, though, was the information that, at the start of the race, it was perceived as a toss-up, and that early polls showed a close race. (It ended up close, but some races end up close only because one candidate closed a large initial gap.) Restoring that information, with a couple sentences, would be reasonable. JamesMLane t c 23:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds reasonable. Feel free to add some polling information to show that the race was perceived as a toss-up in the months preceding the general election. I am willing to do it myself if you don't want to, but right now I am hard-pressed for time and would not be able to do it until later this week, more likely this weekend. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chris Myers (New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Myers (New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Myers (New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]