Talk:Christine L. Borgman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

BigHaz suggested this article be deleted, but I'm not clear why. Borgman is the fourth most highly cited scholar in her field (www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/meho/cronin-meho-01.pdf), and her work has had major implications for communication (especially scholarly communication), computer science, and information science. I was surprised there was not already an article about her in Wikipedia. It's frustrating to start an article in Wikipedia only to find one person can throw all my work into jeopardy. It's as though one is guilty of a bad page in Wikipedia merely by accusation, and the burden is thus on me to prove my innocence for writing the article in the first place. That seems contrary to Wikipedia's original aims. Besides, how many scholars have an endowed chair from the University of California Regents (those are the folks who run the entire UC system, not just UCLA)? That alone seems reason enough for an article.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Christine L. Borgman/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is rated "start" because substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article isn't developed enough for a cleanup tag: it still needs to be built.

Last edited at 18:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 11:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christine L. Borgman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061202203025/http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/cborgman/ to http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/cborgman/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]