Talk:Citygarden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Citygarden has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 8, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 29, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the US$30 million development of Citygarden (pictured), an urban park and sculpture garden in St. Louis, Missouri, was funded solely by a local nonprofit organization?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Citygarden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Puffin Let's talk! 16:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

1. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct?  Done - Yes

2. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation?  Done - Yes

3. It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout?  Done - Yes

4. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines?  Done - Yes

5. It contains no original research?  Done - Yes

6. It addresses the main aspects of the topic?  Done - Yes

7. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail?  Done - Yes

8. It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each?  Done - Yes

9. It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute?  Done - Yes

10. Illustrated, if possible, by images:  Done - Yes

(a) Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content?  Done - Yes

(b) Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions?  Done- Yes

Pass or fail? Pass! Confirms to all criteria.  Done