This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
Classic 100 Swoon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
This has received a deletion notice. It shouldn't be deleted. All previous ABC Classic 100 countdowns have a page. I created this page because nobody had yet created one for the 2015 version. DanJamesS (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (each previous Classic 100 has its own page. Nobody had created a page for the 2015 edition so I created this one) --DanJamesS (talk) 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is part of a series that has been going on for 13 years. (See Classic 100 Countdowns (ABC)). Each broadcast has its own WP article and the series has its own category. As a whole the series is a valuable and encyclopedic record of listener preferences in this music genre. The list is currently complete and deleting this article, which is under development, would undermine that. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]