Talk:Combat

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Synonym?

How does "However, the terms are often used synonymously along with the term "Battle Ready"" make sense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.13.196.87 (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it didn't, so I removed it — Lithium (talk) 10:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fighting ?

Is fighting not a form of combat rather than a alternative name ? Fighting could perhaps refer to unarmed combat ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.176.215.3 (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italic yvb7ung6f7vu text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.226.34 (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verbal Fighting

I noticed the article does not refer whatsoever to verbal combat, so I added a section, along this source: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.120.696&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=66 Rattner2 (talk) 23:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't the one who removed your section, but it didn't seem to explain itself well in the context of the article (I looked back to see where it had gone). However, I agree that fighting can also be verbal, so I added a few words in the lead section.—Lithium (talk) 11:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fight does not always means combat, it may mean verbal argument or competition.59.162.170.113 (talk) 08:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Combat

Cyberbot II has detected links on Combat which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.robertankony.com/lurps-gallery/
Triggered by \brobertankony\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this link (I don't think it's a particularly family friendly page and even though it does warn for viewer discretion, you can always rely on someone to miss that). I also removed the three talk sections above this one warning about the same link. —Lithium (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Fight" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fight and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 15#Fight until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 20:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]