Talk:Conspicuous Service Cross (Australia)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Conspicuous Service Cross (Australia) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily page views
|
Fictional Characters
[edit]Is this section necessary? Does it add to the article? --Oliver Nouther (talk) 21:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The addition of a 'Fictional Characters' section would not demean the article but it may help put the topic in context. --Nford24 (talk) 18:47, 24 December 2011 (AEST)
- I disagree, it seems unnecessary to me. Anotherclown (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- G'day, good question. I'm inclined to agree with Anotherclown on this one. I'm not sure what benefit the article would get from listing fictional characters that have "received" the award. That's just my opinion, though. You might consider asking for wider opinions, though, if you want to get a broader consensus. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Orders, decorations, and medals articles
- Mid-importance Orders, decorations, and medals articles
- WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military culture, traditions, and heraldry articles
- Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force articles