Talk:Copper(I) oxide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chemicals (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Energy (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

prsparation/use? pigment usage?[edit]

This "red plague" sounds like, and has possibly been used as, a painter's pigment, apparently stable when encapsulated in oil, and possibly even water/protein egg "glairs". alas production is currently missing as is any history (I haven't found one either) of an artists' pigment.74.108.139.186 (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Semiconductor properties[edit]

The history of semiconductor research and applications is strongly connected with this material. First semiconductor diode, first Wannier exciton series observation. Today it is of interest because of narrow exciton resonances and long exciton lifetimes, particularly in connection with BEC. Some people also try to build photovoltaic cells from Cu2O. These things need more emphasis. Jcb.h6t (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I deleted the statement about Bose-Einstein condensation, simply because it is wrong. All claims have been refuted. Jcb.h6t (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

If the developments that you mention are so very important, then you might consider replacing the primary journal refs with citations to reviews and books. Primary journal citations are less sought in Wikipedia and are less valuable to readers who seek more perspective. WP:Secondary.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Ok. I replaced some of the references. I will check wether there is a recent review about excitons in Cu2O to replace the others. If not, I delete those parts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcb.h6t (talkcontribs) 09:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)