Talk:Crieff Hydro

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 April 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism: Hotels Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels.

Untitled

Can the deletion notice be removed now, and the discussion about it be restored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.159.136 (talk) 07:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD notice can only be removed when the deletion discussion occurring at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crieff Hydro is concluded. Usually that takes a week, but it can be extended or ended early. Express your opinion about deletion there. Monty ₈₄₅ 07:09, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad the deletion notice has gone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.159.136 (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

citation needed

nd I cannot find any reference for one item, other than "family legend". It is pointed out that a citation is needed for the fact that locals were annoyed that the Poles received priority for ration during WWII. The story comes from my great-unclw who died three yaers befor I was born, and was a common anecdote to my father and also told to his wife, my mother.

That is not original research. Prhaps if I were to go to local Crieff sources like the library, I would learn more. But that would be original reasearch. Suggest a way I can be of more help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.117.25 (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No bars?

I was at the Hydro last night and it has two bars; one in the Meikle restaurant-and-bar, and the other in the conservatory. Also it's a sprawling building and if there are others I didn't find, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised. I can't, however, point you at source-material for this observation, and so it comes by necessity under the heading of 'original research'; I drank there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.120.132.141 (talk) 16:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crieff Hydro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229061052/http://www.schs.org.uk/samplepaper.htm to http://www.schs.org.uk/samplepaper.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]