Talk:DeWalt

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Woodworking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Woodworking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WoodworkingWikipedia:WikiProject WoodworkingTemplate:WikiProject WoodworkingWoodworking articles

DeWalt vs. DeWALT

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move to DeWalt, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 23:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As per Wikipedia's usage policy on trademarks, this page should refer to DeWalt, not DeWALT. Simply because DeWalt's marketing division uses their name in all caps in imitation of their logo does not mean Wikipedia should do the same. Skylark 21:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am in agreement with DeWalt for the reason stated above. —User:Christopher Mann McKay 00:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with "DeWalt", as it reflects the spirit of aforementioned guideline. - Cyrus XIII 23:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. WP:MOSTM and WP:MOSCAPS is quite clear on this. Neier 13:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The Black&Decker section is confusing

It says for instance the company relinquished the "Black & Decker" name. That probably happened but they are currently selling Black & Decker branded tools. It's not intuitive to tell when this section is referring to Black&Decker vs. DeWalt. It's not clearly stated whether the acquisition of the DeWalt trademark was related to the opinion of Michael Hammes. Someone put a [when] citation on the statement "because the company used to be associated with lighter-weight tools." But it would be more helpful knowing when Michael Hammes was vice-president, was it around the time of purchasing DeWalt? Hence I am removing that [when] potshot, which would be potentially difficult to nail down, and putting it were a [when] is more needed to readily improve the poor readability of the section.Mea (talk) 05:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DeWalt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224101829/http://www.toolsofthebrave.com/faq/ to http://www.toolsofthebrave.com/faq/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]