This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is very well done, and I am not just saying that. It is very thoroughly researched, has a ton of information, and is quite interesting. You clearly put a lot of work into the details of each section, especially the 'Career' section. I only found a few minor formatting mistakes, but they are easily fixed (italics under film/TV titles). The biggest thing that may need a change is the headings. While everything you wrote may pertain to the career of Deanne, it could be broken up into different headings, just for organizational purposes. You could add an 'Early Career' section and include everything up until her first feature. For the rest of the information, perhaps a 'Feature Film' section, followed by a 'Television' section would work. If you wanted you could also just split both of her features into different sections and label them by the film's title. For the 'Awards and honours' section, making it into a bulleted list could make it seem more organized, but I will leave that up to you because I honestly think the way you have it formatted now is totally fine (it is just different compared to other article I have seen). Other than what I have already stated, I think your article is great. Good job on your research, you deserve an excellent mark! LoneUniStudent (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): UnoriginalUsername. Peer reviewers: LoneUniStudent, Cmp123.