Talk:Deborah Hertz

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

University of California Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish Women Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

delete....

i reason that: WP:NPF, WP:BLP1E, WP:PRIMARY, WP:No_reliable_sources,_no_verifiability,_no_article#Delete_now.2C_improve_later even though the "subject wrote two books published by a notable publ. house: Yale University Press". so, it seems to me that yale university press is notable, but not her. most (all?) academics have to write to survive, and get published. being published is not encyclopedic...... Soosim (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(copying from my talk page):

Hello Soosim. Here on Wikipedia, it is entirely legitimate to contest a CSD nomination (if you are not the article's creator) and similar rule applies to proposed deletions. You should not revert. If you question notability of the topic, take the article to WP:AFD and explain your objections there. I won't revert, but I'm pretty sure another admin will. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for trying V, but i also had looked and looked and looked and saw nothing, literally, in any RS. your attempt is nice, but a wiki article and a book review still doesn't make her notable. Soosim (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more sources (a book review and an entry in the Jewish Women's Archive). She is a published author and professor at a notable university. All we need is independent coverage in multiple reliable sources. I consider both Moment and JWA independent and reliable. I can continue. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a list of reviews of her first book. It is on the website of her publisher, I hope they don't cheat :D --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deborah Hertz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140829204933/http://deborahhertz.com/curriculum/ to http://deborahhertz.com/curriculum/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why are there book reviews in this page?

This page is about the author not the books, and the lead paragraph needs to be reformatted, it is cluttered with things that should be in the main body. Bgrus22 (talk) 00:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the book reviews further down the page, and removed external links and some of the social media links (left in the two YT talks recently added for the moment). Looks as if a lot of material was added by an editor whose username suggests a possible conflict of interest, but who hasn't been active on the article for a while. Tacyarg (talk) 17:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]