Talk:Demyansk Pocket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


"However, their struggle had denied the Soviet High Command numerous units at a critical moment, units that would have otherwise been used elsewhere." If possible to quote this? Stopping german army there is less critical than at another place? I am a bit confused, if possible to get clarification on this matter? "Used elsewhere" to do what? If it is fighting Germans than I fail to see the point of this quote. Sincerely appreciate you looking into this.

MKb 42[edit]

The deployment of the Mkb42 in this battle is highly disputed, and at the very least should be cited with a source. Production and testing records seem to suggest that it was tested in late 1942, and could not have been part of this battle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:10, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

disputed by deniers — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

2nd Shock Army[edit]

Hi!) You fool) Sorry for my engl) Vlasov and 2 Shock Army - Volhov front general-colonel Hozin. Demiansk - North-West front. general Kurochkin) If you need russian help about WII ask me)

Nothing dealing with the fate of the 2nd Army after the Demiansk Pocket was opened? JonCatalan 14:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Demyansk Pocket[edit]

Are there any maps available which would illustrate this article?


Can we remove the last paragraph and instead offer a link to supply troubles at Stalingard? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demyansk Pocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

contradictory casualties[edit]

"64,000 of whom were either killed, wounded or too sick for service" contradicts the figures at the start of the section by a factor of five. ϢereSpielChequers 05:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)