Jump to content

Talk:Dholpur

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 06:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jubali Hall Dholpur.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Jubali Hall Dholpur.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:31, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dholpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted a spammer/commercial advertisement's edit

[edit]

I reverted a commercial placement link added by Anitass, who has done this before across other wiki papes. Please refer to their Talk page where I also added a warning for commercial editing and listed all their violating edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anitasss&oldid=777879519

This is my revert: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dholpur&diff=prev&oldid=777876948 --Blooker (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dholpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tomar Rule

[edit]

I agree, shall make the necessary corrections. How can the history of Tomar rulers who established Dholpur in 700 Ad( Raja Dholan Dev) be erased. His descendant Raja Vinayak Dev’s battle with Lodhi and the first Johar of the region be ignored ? The entire article has not even a slight mention of the rich history apart from crying about Jat rulers? This is not fair . Jats have been a part of history of Dholpur that is not argumentive but you cannot ignore the history of formative years ? 2401:4900:462F:6AE9:6575:41B9:CC01:CC4F (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tourist Places

[edit]

Add tourist places of dholpur... like Muchkund, Monisiddh pahad, Babri, Clock tower, Ghariyal century, Chambal safari, Longpur pahad, Nibhi ka taal, Achleshwar mahadev mandir, etc 49.204.162.139 (talk) 01:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Declared himself ruler"

[edit]

Users who previously discussed this, include User:Valereee and User:Fourthords.

After coming across this article, I saw that the "Mohammed Jaifoon" addition came from 2008. "Mohammed Jaifoon" was never mentioned even a single time on the web before 2008 (check by using Google/Bing's "Time" tool), nor in the academic literature (checked the paid library I have access to, as well as Wikipedia Library), and only once in Google Books, in a "gazette" that was directly published by the government. I'm removing. That's just one instance, but seeing as there's tons of other unsourced material, there may be more issues.

I'll post more general thoughts at WT:V, just wanted to discuss this instance. DFlhb (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, the wording between the gazette and the "government of Rajasthan" webpage found by Valereee seems identical. DFlhb (talk) 16:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dholpur&oldid=1199490830"