This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
Indeed, I believe the right thing to do would be to keep the DSA article up as is. Then, in future, potentially having a standalone DMA article as well (having two separate articles). Regardless, I believe the DSA article should stay up independently. James Tamim (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who gets to decide what is (a) illegal content, (b) transparent advertising and (c) disinformation? For instance, lets say a Twitter reports on some nefarious activity by some quasi-independent state agency engaged in manipulating social media posts. The said agency could declare such reports disinformation or illegal content. In short the DSA could become an instrument of censorship. Cases in point being the ‘Twitter Files’ and the Biden Laptop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.217.104 (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A court would decide, and it is not appropriate to 'clarify' these terms on Wikipedia, as they are only as clear as you stated and they will only become more clear after they are tested in court. Vonkelonkel (talk) 01:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2024 and 15 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbrownaz24 (article contribs).