Jump to content

Talk:Dilworth Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"south facade" picture doesn't really belong

[edit]

The article currently includes this picture:

The south facade as seen from S. Broad Street at Locust Street (2013)

That's a great shot of City Hall, but it doesn't really fit with this article. Dilworth Park is not only not featured in the picture; it isn't even visible. It seems that this picture was on its way to the City Hall article but it took a wrong turn at Penn Square. TypoBoy (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dilworth Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Dilworth Park a building or a park?

[edit]

The article was recently edited to use the "building" infobox instead of the "park" infobox. The "building" infobox has attributes like "height", that are meaningful for buildings but not for parks. Dilworth Park, we are now saying, is 548 feet tall. What is that supposed to mean?

My opinion is that, since Dilworth Park is a park, we should use the park infobox. Is there a reason to think otherwise? TypoBoy (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TypoBoy: Looks like I solved that before seeing this comment. lol – – The Grid (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]