Talk:Dmitry Shemyaka

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note

It seems that [1] mentions another title "Shemyaka's Justice". I will check in Russian sources. Lom Konkreta (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 12:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Shemyaka → Dmitrii Shemiaka – WP:COMMONNAME according to a Google Books Ngram chart.[2] For four decades this spelling has been more commonly used than the next two put together,[3] from 50% to 85% of total usage.[4] —Michael Z. 23:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, the difference is insignificant. Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1) If it is insignificant, then why oppose the change mandated by the guideline? 2) Lately you opposed a number of similar changes because you thought they were destructive, “pure disruption”[5] (“massively”),[6] and comprising a “crusade.”[7][8][9][10] Why don’t you tell us what you really think? —Michael Z. 00:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are net negative in this topic area and should be topic banned, do you want me to repeat this every time I oppose your disruptive nomination? The change is not mandated by any guideline, you are just on a crusade against WP:RUS as you yourself said in the past. Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your honesty. You are on a crusade against me, as you have said in the past and are openly saying now. I think you should cease and desist from targeting me with your disruption. —Michael Z. 09:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.