Talk:Dominic Tweddle
Appearance
A fact from Dominic Tweddle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]Does he meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG? Boleyn (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review of the page Dominic Tweddle @Boleyn:. I've added categories and removed the request for inline citations; I'm not sure why the latter was there, since inline citation were already used throughout. Regarding notability, I think he meets the WP:PROF guidelines in three ways:
- 1) Research with a significant impact: He is the main person responsible for the research on the Coppergate helmet, and in doing so published the most comprehensive typology of Anglo-Saxon and Viking helmets (Tweddle 1992)
- 2) Prestigious scholarly society: He's a fellow of both the Society of Antiquaries of London and the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland
- 3) Appointed post: He's the Director General of the National Museum of the Royal Navy
- I've expanded coverage of the first in the article. Please let me know if that addresses all the issues! Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to explain that to me, Usernameunique. I'll remove the notability tag. My only remaining concern is the 'Bibliography' section - is it suggested further reading or sources that should be inlnie? Thanks again for your hard work on this, Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your work and input, Boleyn. I'm not sure what exactly the difference is between 'Bibliography' and 'Further reading' sections; to bridge the difference I've added citations to ensure that each source supports a particular part of the page. Hope that works! Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles