Talk:Dor (film)
![]() | Dor (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]This page looks like more of praise of the movie then information about it
Fair use rationale for Image:Dorfilm.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Dorfilm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Bold text
Successful good article nomination
[edit]- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! Dor has met all the criteria to become a good article. Thanks to all who contributed! Limetolime (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking out time for the GA assessment. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 18:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Discussion pertaining to non-free image(s) used in article
[edit]A cleanup page has been created for WP:FILMS' spotlight articles. One element that is being checked in ensuring the quality of the articles is the non-free images. Currently, one or more non-free images being used in this article are under discussion to determine if they should be removed from the article for not complying with non-free and fair use requirements. Please comment at the corresponding section within the image cleanup listing. Before contributing the discussion, please first read WP:FILMNFI concerning non-free images. Ideally the discussions pertaining to the spotlight articles will be concluded by the end of June, so please comment soon to ensure there is clear consensus. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Dor (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080629220245/http://www.indiafm.com:80/features/2006/09/20/1595/index.html to http://www.indiafm.com/features/2006/09/20/1595/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090221070601/http://www.hinduonnet.com:80/thehindu/fr/2006/09/22/stories/2006092201140100.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fr/2006/09/22/stories/2006092201140100.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016094553/http://indiafm.com:80/features/2006/10/20/1725/index.html to http://www.indiafm.com/features/2006/10/20/1725/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Dor (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080415053731/http://www.apunkachoice.com/happenings/20060918-0.html to http://www.apunkachoice.com/happenings/20060918-0.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821172506/http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20060920-3.html to http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20060920-3.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221135511/http://202.54.157.195/news/181_1779618%2C001100050001.htm to http://202.54.157.195/news/181_1779618%2C001100050001.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318210531/http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20070220-0.html to http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20070220-0.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070922033735/http://www.calcuttaweb.com/cinema/2005_2006_bfja.shtml to http://calcuttaweb.com/cinema/2005_2006_bfja.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dor (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216221555/http://movies.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2596425.cms to http://movies.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2596425.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- Film articles with archived peer reviews
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance Indian cinema articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles